Filtered (55)
Filters
Search
Type
Country
Categories
Show (55)
Cancel
Case T-262/24 Commission v EDPS

Data Processing Agreement (DPA), Data Sharing, Records of processing Activities (ROPA)

Proof of concept Blockchain and the right to erasure by AEPD

Right to Erasure

DIRECTIVE (EU) 2024/2853 on liability for defective products and repealing

New technology

Records Management Toolkit Tracker

Data Retention, Personal Data Collection, Records of processing Activities (ROPA)

Records Management Toolkit Tracker – more information about the Toolkit by UK ICO

Data Retention, Personal Data Collection, Records of processing Activities (ROPA)

Austrian Data Protection Authority (dsb)-Website operator (1/4/2024)

Administratives Measures, Data Subjects Rights, Liability and Remedies, Right to Erasure

Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd)-ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA PARA LA ENSEÑANZA ONLINE (11/30/2021)

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure

Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd)-ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA PARA LA ENSEÑANZA ONLINE (11/30/2021)

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure

Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd)-UNIVERSIDAD A DISTANCIA DE MADRID, S.A. (7/29/2021)

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure

Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd)-Pagamastarde S.L. (4/27/2021)

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure

Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and the Freedom of Information (NAIH)-Unnamed financial institution (3/4/2019)

Controllers and Processors, Data Subjects Rights, Principles, Purpose limitation, Representative, Right to Erasure

Guidelines 2/2023 on Technical Scope of Art. 5(3) of ePrivacy Directive Version 2.0 by EDPB

New technology

The Future of European Competitiveness by EU Commission

AI, New technology, Specific processing situations

PRESS RELEASE No 20/24 | Case C-118-22

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure

Case C 683-2021

Data Controller, Data Processors, Joint Controllers

Infographic DPC TikTok Fine

Fairness, Liability and Remedies, Principles, Supervisory Authorities

Decision of the Data Protection Commission made pursuant to Section 111 of the DPA, 2018 and Articles 60 and 65 of the GDPR

Fairness, Liability and Remedies, Principles, Supervisory Authorities

C-460/20

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure, Search Engines, Specific processing situations

One-Stop-Shop thematic case digest: RIGHT TO OBJECTAND RIGHT TO ERASURE

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure, Right to Object

C-272/19

Access Requests (DSAR), Data Controller, Data Subjects Rights, Definitions

C-136/17

Data Subjects Rights, Principles, Right to Erasure, Search Engines, Sensitive Data, Specific processing situations

C-507/17

Data Subjects Rights, Right to Erasure, Territorial Scope

C-129/21

Consent, Data Subjects Rights, Lawfulness of Processing, Right to Erasure

Emerging digital technologies in the public sector report by EU Commission

New technology

Case C‑461/22 CURIA

Data Controller, Definitions

EditorsTrends in Data Protection and Encryption Technologies by SpringerProfessional

Definitions, New technology, Processing of personal data

Opinion 19/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Hungary regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EDPB

Accreditation

Opinion 25/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Lithuania regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EDPB

Accreditation

Opinion 39/2021 on whether Article 58(2)(g) GDPR could serve as a legal basis for a supervisory authority to order ex officio the erasure of personal data, in a situation where such request was not submitted by the data subject |EPDB

Data Controller, Data Subjects Rights, Definitions

Opinion 35/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Belgium regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 36/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Norway regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 37/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Malta regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 38/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Latvia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 12/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of France regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 13/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Bulgaria regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 11/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Sweden regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 12/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Cyprus regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 13/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Croatia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 11/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Poland regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

Opinion 4/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Malta regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a certification body pursuant to Article 43.3 (GDPR) |EPDB

Accreditation

EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 02/2023 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the digital euro

Accreditation

EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 01/2023 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down additional procedural rules relating to the enforcement of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

Accreditation

Joint statement on data scraping and the protection of privacy

Personal Data Collection

Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González [2014] Case C-131/12

Search Engines

Fashion ID, 29 July 2019, C-40/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:629

Data Controller, Data Processors

Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH, in the presence of Facebook Ireland Ltd (Case C-210/16).

Data Controller

CNIL and others v Google Case C 136/17

Search Engines, Specific processing situations

Google v CNIL Case C 507/17

Search Engines

Records of Processing Activities under Article 30 GDPR | Irish DPC

Records of processing Activities (ROPA)

WORKING PARTY 29 POSITION PAPER on the derogations from the obligation to maintain records of processing activities pursuant to Article 30(5) GDPR

Records of processing Activities (ROPA)

Records of processing activities template by the CNIL

Records of processing Activities (ROPA)

Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR

Data Controller, Data Processors, Definitions

Guidelines 5/2019 on the criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR

Right to Erasure

Telegram CEO’s Arrest Sparks Debate on Privacy vs. Regulation

Personal Data Collection, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Salvatore Manni Case C 398/15

Data Retention, Legitimate Interest, Storage limitation