Filtered (39)
Filters
Search
Type
Categories
Show (39)
Cancel
DIRECTIVE (EU) 2024/2853 on liability for defective products and repealing

New technology

Supreme Court of Singapore’s Circular on the Use of GenAI Tools in Court Documents

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Guidelines 2/2023 on Technical Scope of Art. 5(3) of ePrivacy Directive Version 2.0 by EDPB

New technology

EDPS Model Administrative Arrangement

Data Processing by the Government, Data Transfers, Specific processing situations

The Future of European Competitiveness by EU Commission

AI, New technology, Specific processing situations

Government access to datain third countries

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Infographic DPC TikTok Fine

Fairness, Liability and Remedies, Principles, Supervisory Authorities

Decision of the Data Protection Commission made pursuant to Section 111 of the DPA, 2018 and Articles 60 and 65 of the GDPR

Fairness, Liability and Remedies, Principles, Supervisory Authorities

Recommendations 1-2022 on the Application for Approval and on the elements and principles to be found in Controller Binding Corporate Rules (Art. 47 GDPR)

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

C-439/19

Criminal Convictions and Offences, Lawfulness of Processing, Principles, Public Interests

Joined Cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18

Criminal Convictions and Offences, National Security, Principles, Specific processing situations

C-180/21

Criminal Convictions and Offences, Lawfulness of Processing, Principles, Public Interests

C-205/21

Consent, Criminal Convictions and Offences, Lawfulness of Processing, Principles

Noyb Complaint Case: C-082-01 to EU Data protection Supervisor against EU Parliament

Controllers and Processors, Data Breaches, Public Administrative Body

GDPR in practice – Experiences of data protection authorities by FRA

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Noyb Complaint Case: C-082-02 to EU Data protection Supervisor against EU Parliament

Controllers and Processors, Data Breaches, Public Administrative Body

Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by Australian Government

AI, Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Emerging digital technologies in the public sector report by EU Commission

New technology

Data protection code of practice for digital identity schemes in Afrtica

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

EditorsTrends in Data Protection and Encryption Technologies by SpringerProfessional

Definitions, New technology, Processing of personal data

GDPR in practice: Experience of data protection authorities by FRA

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Opinion 23/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Czech Republic regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 24/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovakia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 16/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the “EU Data Protection Code of Conduct for Cloud Service Providers” submitted by Scope Europe |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 17/2021 on the draft decision of the French Supervisory Authority regarding the European code of conduct submitted by the Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers (CISPE) |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 14/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Bulgaria regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 15/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Luxembourg regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 16/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovenia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 1/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Croatia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 02/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Latvia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 03/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Romania regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Members of the Code of Conduct for Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers

Code of Conduct

Recommendations for companies planning to use Cloud computing services by CNIL

Cloud Services

Data Protection Code of Conduct for Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers

Cloud Services

Elaboration of the Code of Conduct for Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers (CNIL)

Cloud Services

Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under Regulation 2016/679

Code of Conduct

Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC): Corporate Plan for 2024-25

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

The government-wide vision on Generative Al of the Netherlands

AI, Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

ANAF Case C‑201/14, 1 October 2015

Automated Decision-making, Data Sharing, Data Transfers, Public Administrative Body