Resources

Assessing Potential Future AI Risks, Benefits, and Policy Imperatives OECD

AI, Risk Management, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Reducing Risks Posed by Synthetic Content by NIST

AI, Risk Management, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

CAIDP Responds to Outcome of U.S. Convening of AI Safety Institutes

AI, Risk Management, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Data Protection Authority of Hamburg-Company (7/12/1905)

Definitions, Joint Controllers

Guidelines on Securing AI Systems by The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA)

AI, Risk Management, Specific processing situations

Cyber Threat Modelling for Risk Assessment by CSB

Risk Management, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Chief Information Security Officer_ HANDBOOK

Risk Management

“AI & Algorithmic Risks Report” by Dutch Data Protection Authority

AI, Risk Management, Specific processing situations

NIST Special Publication NIST SP 800-221A_Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Risk Outcomes Integrating ICT Risk Management Programs with the Enterprise Risk Portfolio

Risk Management

Case C‑604/22

Joint Controllers, Personal Data

DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA PRIVACY PROTECTION AGENCY

Risk Management

Case C 683-2021

Data Controller, Data Processors, Joint Controllers

Press Release No 184-23 by the CJEU

Controllers and Processors, Joint Controllers, Liability and Remedies, Supervisory Authorities

Guidelines issued by the Malta Gaming Authority for the Maltese Gaming Industry

Gaming, Specific processing situations

Recommendations 1-2022 on the Application for Approval and on the elements and principles to be found in Controller Binding Corporate Rules (Art. 47 GDPR)

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

C-272/19

Access Requests (DSAR), Data Controller, Data Subjects Rights, Definitions

Case C-60/22

Accountability, Controllers and Processors, Joint Controllers, Principles

Effective Cyber Risk Management: A best practice governance guide for digitally secure and resilient organisations by Governance Institute of Australia

Risk Management, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Data protection code of practice for digital identity schemes in Afrtica

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Case C‑461/22 CURIA

Data Controller, Definitions

Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in Risk Assessment by the European Labour Authority

Risk Management

Opinion 23/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Czech Republic regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 24/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovakia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 16/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the “EU Data Protection Code of Conduct for Cloud Service Providers” submitted by Scope Europe |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 17/2021 on the draft decision of the French Supervisory Authority regarding the European code of conduct submitted by the Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers (CISPE) |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Generative Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment by State of California Department of Technology

AI, Risk Management, Specific processing situations

Opinion 39/2021 on whether Article 58(2)(g) GDPR could serve as a legal basis for a supervisory authority to order ex officio the erasure of personal data, in a situation where such request was not submitted by the data subject |EPDB

Data Controller, Data Subjects Rights, Definitions

Opinion 14/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Bulgaria regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 15/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Luxembourg regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 16/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovenia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 1/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Croatia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 02/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Latvia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 03/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Romania regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Fashion ID, 29 July 2019, C-40/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:629

Data Controller, Data Processors

Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH, in the presence of Facebook Ireland Ltd (Case C-210/16).

Data Controller

Members of the Code of Conduct for Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers

Code of Conduct

Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR

Data Controller, Data Processors, Definitions

Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under Regulation 2016/679

Code of Conduct

Rules of Procedure by EDPB on the cooperation and respective roles of national SAs and the EDPB Secretariat regarding the submission of complaints in the redress mechanism available to EU individuals in relation to alleged violations of U.S law with respect to their data collected by U.S. authorities competent for national security

Adequacy Decisions, Data Transfers, Risk Management

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework by NIST: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile

AI, Risk Management, Specific processing situations

Building a Cybersecurity and Privacy Learning Program | NIST | Initial Public Draft

Data Breaches, Employment, Risk Management, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Board of Directors Handbook for Cloud Risk Governance | Google

Risk Management

The EDPB data protection guide for small business

AI, Risk Management

Approach to Data Spaces from GDPR Perspective (AEPD)

Data Spaces, Risk Management